The Rubin Report- A model for political discourse

Over the past several months I have been encouraged by finding self-identified “classical liberals” calling for more dialogue between opposing views in response to the volatile political climate.  One of these voices is Dave Rubin.  I respect what he is trying to do even though I disagree with him on many levels in terms of policy. He is trying to maintain consistency of character and a set of ideals as opposed to following the wayward (and increasingly left-leaning) movements of the broader American political industrial complex.  He is asking questions instead of just accepting what he is being told by popular culture and he has the courage to have conversations with people he disagrees with. I respect this very much and see it as a model for how we should responsibly care for and reunite our country.  Indeed, at least in principle, we should be open to being persuaded by opposing views.

I think the reason the Rubin Report is an attractive model of political discourse is for the following reasons:

  • Both people involved in the interview know what to expect- They are about to interact on a divisive topic that the other potentially disagrees. It is an appropriate setting.
  • There is an openness to share their personal views with each other without fear of reprisal.
  • There is an understanding that, although there is a desire to solve problems and resolve disagreements, that this might not happen right away.
  • They follow the general formula laid out in a previous article HERE:
    • They attempt to not misrepresent the other side
    • They are not averse to being exposed to contrary beliefs
    • They do not name call
    • They do not assume all members of a group agree on every issue
    • They attempt to follow principles and not feelings alone
    • They agree that not all ideas are equally beneficial (even though they might disagree on which ideas are most beneficial)
    • They have introspected and attempted to understand themselves
    • They understand the basics of argumentation and logic

Again, I do not agree with him on most things but I would gladly sit down with him and have a conversation.  I highly recommend watching some of his interviews below:

Larry Elder and Dave Rubin: Conservatives, Black Lives Matter, Racism (Full Interview)

Ben Shapiro and Dave Rubin: Conservatism vs Leftism and Free Speech (Full Interview)

Sam Harris and Dave Rubin Talk Religion, Politics, Free Speech (Full Interview)

Milo Yiannopoulos and Dave Rubin Talk Donald Trump, Censorship, and Free Speech (Full Interview)

Dinesh D’Souza and Dave Rubin: Hillary Clinton, the Democrats, and Trump (Full Interview)

Alex Epstein and Dave Rubin Discuss the Climate Change Debate (Full Interview)

Christina Hoff Sommers and Dave Rubin: Feminism, Free Speech, Gamergate [Full Interview] (I have not watched this yet but look forward to it!)

Advertisements

One thought on “The Rubin Report- A model for political discourse

  1. Good stuff Joe. Well written, bringing people together. Churchill warned against the lefts (sometimes the right) tending toward having a gestapo/1984/Darkness at Noon type movement on controlling speech and ideas. He thought dialogue and respect were key to that exchange. This article is important to fight that end.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s