Response to article by pro-Sanders Christian I appreciate the above article. If anything, it goes to prove that, contrary to popular belief, Liberty University is diverse and open to alternative views.  My wife graduated from there and I went there for two years but graduated from another college.  We loved attending and have some great friends and memories from Liberty. […]

The World Could Use More Satire

I think the world could use more satire. The wildly popular Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert t.v. shows provide examples of the power of satire. They are entertaining but also packed with significant meaning for many people. My only concern regarding folks (usually in my generation) who enjoy these types of programs is: making sure that we also supplement our craving for political satire with alternative, well informed and serious, information on all topics. Satirical writing and humor is used as a gateway to raise awareness but should not be the sole source of our view on reality. Satire should lead us to delve deeper into topics but not leave us content in our knowledge of a subject. Definition: sat·ire-ˈsaˌtī(ə)r/
:the use of humor, irony, exaggeration, or ridicule to expose and criticize people’s stupidity or vices, particularly in the context of contemporary politics and other topical issues. Taken from Google search: “Satire”

Article on Evolutionary Psychology

Interesting article. A lot of it was over my head but it is always nice to re-confirm infighting and disagreement among naturalists. Scientists dont have the corner on truth. Science is a term broadly used today to mean “truth” (scientism). This is false however as science is merely a methodology that provides raw data. Scientists are humans who have just as many biases and dogmas as any joe on the street. The author notes how “evolution” has been used by scientists as a method of gaining power and advancing political agendas throughout recent history. On a side note, if only physical explanations of human consciousness and behavior are available (as naturalism postulates), then I would like the author to offer an alternative-more plausible option than evolutionary psychology.